CKE PowerServer X-series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	CKE PowerServer X-series (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '20 at 19:45
Run Duration	279 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2660 0 1,318 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 77.2 1-Core 56.5 2-Core 114 52% 82.6 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 515 47% 395 Pts	64-Core 720 45% 720 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84 8,513 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 14 7.5 13 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 400 Write 17.2 Mixed 26.9 SusWrite 14.4 24% 115 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 8.1 4K Mixed 8.5 41% 11.3 MB/s	DQ Read 33.5 DQ Write 4.7 DQ Mixed 9.6 9% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 56%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 124% 402GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 367 449 449 445 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 91 Write 101 Mixed 152 SusWrite 302 37% 161 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 20.7 4K Mixed 28.3 89% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 221 176% 247 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 165%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 124% 927GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 448 446 449 449 445 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	Read 1670 Write 437 Mixed 169 SusWrite 394 144% 667 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 21.7 4K Mixed 28.1 97% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 218 173% 242 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 165%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 2TB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 133 139 138 139 163 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	115% Outstanding	Read 1,653 Write 115 Mixed 209 SusWrite 143 113% 530 MB/s	4K Read 52.8 4K Write 12.2 4K Mixed 12.4 102% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 211 DQ Mixed 209 166% 232 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 115%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 78GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 138 140 140 140 140 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Read 133 Write 146 Mixed 73.6 SusWrite 140 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 89%
WL4000GSA6472B 4TB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 35GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 92 92 94 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 137 Write 149 Mixed 78.2 SusWrite 92.5 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 96%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB 2,051 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 121 117 119 120 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 48.7 Write 126 Mixed 70.9 SusWrite 120 67% 91.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.6 177% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 68%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 55GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 52 52 54 53 55 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.4% Above average	Read 138 Write 19.1 Mixed 48.7 SusWrite 53.6 48% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.5 254% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 62%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 357GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 75 75 65 39 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	87.3% Excellent	Read 235 Write 18.8 Mixed 87.4 SusWrite 66.5 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 0.9 403% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 62%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 39 39 42 40 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 68%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 2,304 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 55GB free, PID 0210 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 60 60 61 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Read 55.4 Write 60.5 Mixed 29 SusWrite 60.4 69% 51.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- 4x8GB 322 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	90% Outstanding	MC Read 37.7 MC Write 36.5 MC Mixed 34 103% 36.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 11 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 86 46% 86 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

CKE PowerServer X-series

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)