CKE PowersServer

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	CKE PowersServer (all builds)
Memory	24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201004
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '20 at 17:12
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2660 0 1,318 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 78.2 1-Core 56.6 2-Core 116 52% 83.6 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 495 47% 389 Pts	64-Core 701 43% 701 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450 10,238 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 90B7) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1001 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.64% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 2.23 Parallax 1.97 2% 2.09 fps	MRender 1.76 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 2.17 2% 1.85 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.64% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84 8,513 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 9.6 8.2 15 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 413 Write 33 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 11.9 25% 119 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 9.1 40% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 56%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 124% 404GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 451 161 32 168 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 1,304 Write 450 Mixed 691 SusWrite 221 147% 667 MB/s	4K Read 55.6 4K Write 27.9 4K Mixed 34.3 143% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 297 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 186 152% 221 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 165%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 124% 300GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 48 428 449 425 450 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 1,345 Write 51.6 Mixed 102 SusWrite 309 96% 452 MB/s	4K Read 55.9 4K Write 22.2 4K Mixed 28.2 133% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 297 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 207 168% 239 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 165%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 258GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 83 83 83 79 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	94.3% Outstanding	Read 1,301 Write 85.2 Mixed 152 SusWrite 83.9 86% 406 MB/s	4K Read 50 4K Write 8.7 4K Mixed 11.1 95% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 206 162% 226 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 115%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 129GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 140 139 138 140 141 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 122 Write 146 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 140 88% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 89%
WL4000GSA6472B 4TB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 313GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 105 105 104 102 105 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 11.2 Write 14.9 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 104 25% 34.9 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 96%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB 2,051 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 54 56 56 52 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 19.6 Write 77.5 Mixed 35.2 SusWrite 53 34% 46.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.4 139% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 68%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 55GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 48 44 46 49 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.2% Above average	Read 134 Write 17.1 Mixed 47 SusWrite 46.4 45% 61 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.4 248% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 62%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 386GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 97 82 53 61 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	91.1% Outstanding	Read 234 Write 19.2 Mixed 89.9 SusWrite 81.4 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 6.8 4K Mixed 1 416% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 62%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 41 41 43 44 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 68%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 2,304 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 2TB free, PID 0210 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 117 118 118 118 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 96.7 Write 100 Mixed 40.2 SusWrite 118 120% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- 4x8GB 322 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	85.7% Excellent	MC Read 36.1 MC Write 34.5 MC Mixed 32.8 98% 34.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 8.5 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 84 48% 84 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

CKE PowersServer

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)