MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7994
MotherboardMSI H110M ECO (MS-7994)  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '21 at 08:07
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100T-$108
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 203
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 286
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
MSI(1462 7994) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.5127
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.06% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 5.7
4% 5.77 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 9.3
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.06%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 500GB
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 301 255 230 227 233 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 423
Write 412
Mixed 346
SusWrite 269
82% 362 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 36.9
122% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 127
119% 184 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 135%
Samsung SSD 4TB
322GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 391 385 367 355 349 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 430
Write 410
Mixed 393
SusWrite 370
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 35.3
118% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 208
153% 201 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C13 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
78.6% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 26.4
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 25.4
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M ECO (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback