PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus WS X299 SAGE (all builds) |
Memory | 36.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180319 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Mar 31 '21 at 17:17 |
Run Duration | 258 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
|
93.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 490 493 484 468 462 MB/s
|
126%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
250GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2562 2570 2385 2230 2228 2220 MB/s
|
409%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 224 217 226 218 220 MB/s
|
||||
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01S01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 380 387 391 392 375 MB/s
|
||||
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID 800e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 5.4 5.7 5.4 5.7 5.5 MB/s
|
7.03%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CMK32GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M1A2666C16 CMK32GX4M2A2400C16 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384 MB
|
72.7%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i9-10980XEIntel $1,100Bench 84%, 4,959 samples | 36x |
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples | 33x |
Core i9-7920XIntel $250Bench 82%, 5,430 samples | 21x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 44x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 23x |
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $1,584 |