Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 1095AR1

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 1095AR1 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	29 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170327
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '21 at 11:44
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2658 0 52 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Memory 58.9 1-Core 61.1 2-Core 121 47% 80.5 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 426 39% 328 Pts	64-Core 1,090 67% 1,090 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350 22,303 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8387) 1.2GB CLim: 742 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	20.3% Poor	Lighting 23.6 Reflection 38.5 Parallax 28.2 19% 30.1 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 21 Splatting 24.6 22% 27.8 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 64GB 296 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 164 163 136 129 143 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43% Average	Read 224 Write 168 Mixed 147 SusWrite 149 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 17.6 64% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 55.7 DQ Mixed 87.9 72% 107 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 62%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 200GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 186GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.9 7.8 7.8 7.3 8.6 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 158 Write 24.5 Mixed 26.9 SusWrite 7.9 40% 54.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 48%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB 498 User benchmarks, average bench 154% 3.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.2 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Read 250 Write 26.3 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 8.9 56% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 223%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5273CH0- M393B5270CH0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5270CH0- M393B5270CH0- M393B5270CH0- M393B5270CH0- M393B5270CH0- 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	73% Very good	MC Read 34.8 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 26.6 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 131 31% 131 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback