Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateApr 09 '21 at 02:15
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 199
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 378
51% 379 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 6% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aps-sl3n -256 256GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S091
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 2.7 7.7 32 11 33 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 476
Write 380
Mixed 331
SusWrite 45.6
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 26.1
141% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 82
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 0.3
58% 133 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 72%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
82GB free
Firmware: 19.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 99 101 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 97
Write 90.5
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 96.7
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
27GB free
Firmware: 18.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 79 84 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 82.5
Write 73.5
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 81.5
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 11,751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback