Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '21 at 12:41
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 96.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 186
79% 132 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 600
62% 497 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2303) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.1
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.6% Average
Lighting 57.1
Reflection 64.6
Parallax 81.6
46% 67.8 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 65
Splatting 47.2
47% 58.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$100
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,394
Write 5506
Mixed 5,907
1,324% 5,936 MB/s
4K Read 322
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 163
771% 209 MB/s
DQ Read 796
DQ Write 442
DQ Mixed 544
424% 594 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$38
432GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 132 134 134 135 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 132
Write 116
Mixed 68
SusWrite 132
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
72% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-CK0 M378B5173CB0-CK0 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 23.4
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 22.6
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 50.9
78% 50.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback