Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 122% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 137% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	98.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI (all builds)
Memory	115.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210329
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '21 at 07:13
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900K-$440 107,269 User benchmarks, average bench 100% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Memory 80.6 1-Core 152 2-Core 298 95% 177 Pts	4-Core 577 8-Core 1,120 101% 849 Pts	64-Core 2057 127% 2057 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 106%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 2080-$391 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Device(7377 1401) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	129% Outstanding	Lighting 176 Reflection 165 Parallax 169 143% 170 fps	MRender 183 Gravity 150 Splatting 126 122% 153 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 134%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 39,219 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	6.36% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 10.6 Parallax 9.3 5% 8.7 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 7.8 Splatting 12.4 9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.36% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$255 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 416 417 423 425 425 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 466 Mixed 340 SusWrite 421 97% 431 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 34.6 120% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 278 229% 329 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 226GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 417 424 427 427 428 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 472 Mixed 451 SusWrite 424 104% 461 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 78.3 4K Mixed 48.2 156% 53.8 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 354 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 133%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90 17,487 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 309GB free Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 411 417 420 420 422 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Read 417 Write 455 Mixed 325 SusWrite 417 91% 403 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 68.8 4K Mixed 34.5 119% 42.9 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 157 158% 252 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 105%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 776GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 159 164 162 164 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 184 Mixed 23.1 SusWrite 162 98% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 108%
WD WD100EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB 2,620 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 498GB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 130 127 129 134 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 83.2 Write 89.2 Mixed 59.4 SusWrite 131 66% 90.7 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.1 294% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 113%
Toshiba HDWG21C 12TB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 9TB free Firmware: 0601 SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 229 233 236 235 234 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Read 236 Write 210 Mixed 78.8 SusWrite 232 138% 189 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x31.8GB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	MC Read 33 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 28.8 90% 31.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 43.5 SC Mixed 27.4 84% 29.6 GB/s	Latency 79.5 50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 10,860 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 150%

UFO

Desktop 106%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

CPU
Core i7-11700KIntel $235Bench 101%, 65,651 samples	3,842x
Core i5-11600KIntel $180Bench 99%, 43,966 samples	1,286x
Core i9-11900KIntel $258Bench 103%, 44,319 samples	1,176x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $490Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,188x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,178x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	939x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	913x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	707x
670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $80Bench 251%, 14,932 samples	493x

RAM
Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GTZR 2x16GBGBench 91%, 10,357 samples	353x
CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 45,582 samples	309x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $67Bench 85%, 86,372 samples	304x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $831

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16