Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 101% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 90% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210320
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '21 at 23:51
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Memory 80.9 1-Core 149 2-Core 299 95% 176 Pts	4-Core 597 8-Core 891 93% 744 Pts	64-Core 889 55% 889 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Gigabyte(1458 4009) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 116 Parallax 127 99% 121 fps	MRender 183 Gravity 112 Splatting 107 106% 134 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB 36,473 User benchmarks, average bench 198% 382GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1062 469 461 461 461 466 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	224% Outstanding	Read 1,431 Write 1765 Mixed 1,495 SusWrite 563 296% 1,314 MB/s	4K Read 49.1 4K Write 215 4K Mixed 84 296% 116 MB/s	DQ Read 740 DQ Write 1,080 DQ Mixed 986 725% 936 MB/s
Poor: 125% ↑ This bench: 224% Great: 262%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB 36,473 User benchmarks, average bench 198% 412GB free Firmware: ECFM22.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1222 517 519 518 518 520 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	225% Outstanding	Read 1,129 Write 515 Mixed 1,472 SusWrite 636 210% 938 MB/s	4K Read 49.3 4K Write 192 4K Mixed 82.7 282% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 1,181 DQ Write 1,234 DQ Mixed 1323 963% 1,246 MB/s
Poor: 125% ↑ This bench: 225% Great: 262%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 218 218 220 217 220 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 176 Mixed 174 SusWrite 218 140% 188 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.1 431% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 106%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 388GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 114 115 113 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	77% Very good	Read 154 Write 134 Mixed 87 SusWrite 114 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 108%
TOSHIBA MQ04ABF100 1TB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 615GB free, PID 0429 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 136 135 137 137 137 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 145 Write 144 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 134 144% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 38% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 52%
WDC WD50 00AACS-00G8B0 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 243GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 35 36 36 35 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.4% Poor	Read 33.5 Write 34 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 35.5 44% 32.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.7 111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 21%
Mass Storage Device 320GB 2,915 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 115GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 35.3 Write 37.6 Mixed 32.1 SusWrite 38.8 50% 35.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 30,689 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	MC Read 40.9 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 39 99% 34.6 GB/s	SC Read 27.8 SC Write 24.1 SC Mixed 38.1 86% 30 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,652x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,264x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,416x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,239x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,077x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,471x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,836x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	771x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	726x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $933

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16