Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '21 at 04:33
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 68.3
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 189
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 410
55% 409 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.3% Poor
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 43.8
Parallax 36.2
28% 38.1 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 35.9
Splatting 25.6
26% 32.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1210A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 4.7 65 3.6 40 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 481
Write 347
Mixed 8
SusWrite 40.7
48% 219 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
35% 8.63 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$36
871GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 177 200 201 200 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 191
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 194
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Avant W641GU42J9266NB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback