Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME H310M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-A  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191016
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 08 '20 at 00:07
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$135
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 163
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 322
39% 302 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 450
Dell(1028 1003) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 14.7
10% 14 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 17.2
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor STM3500320AS 500GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 41 64 77 80 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 94.1
Write 99.2
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 67.9
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
56GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 107 106 108 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 88.3
Write 99.8
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 106
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Avant W641GU42J9266NB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 8.6
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-A Builds (Compare 858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback