HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150324
Uptime6 Days
Run DateApr 27 '21 at 17:37
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 167
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 276
38% 280 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1494) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.1
1% 1.13 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 25 40 75 79 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 98.6
Write 84.9
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 66.5
57% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
159GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 91 86 96 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 57.6
Write 54.9
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 92.5
45% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 60%
Ssk-dk10 0 500GB
2GB free
Firmware: 010A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 13 13 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 22.6
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 12.4
16% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 70%
Ssk-dk10 0 3TB
305GB free
Firmware: 010A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 13 13 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 24.2
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 12.4
16% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 98%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 21.5
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 19.2
31% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
35% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 59%
ST1000LM 048-2E7172 1TB
294GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 19 20 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 22.4
Write 23.5
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 19.5
30% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.2
144% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 CT51264BA1339.M16F M378B5273DH0-CH9 CT51264BD1339.M16F 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.1% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 9.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,793 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback