Today's hottest deals

Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 175%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 301%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive498% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory247.9 GB free of 256 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '21 at 03:41
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 32-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 73
1-Core 152
2-Core 304
93% 177 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 1,151
102% 866 Pts
64-Core 5,533
342% 5,533 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$730
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 281
Reflection 256
Parallax 286
229% 275 fps
MRender 320
Gravity 238
Splatting 177
193% 245 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 194%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4751 4781 4800 4798 3992 1597 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
498% Outstanding
Read 3,050
Write 4,129
Mixed 2,861
SusWrite 4,120
802% 3,540 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 71
247% 91.9 MB/s
DQ Read 984
DQ Write 1,187
DQ Mixed 1,082
817% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 498%
Great: 546%
Amd-raid Array 2 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8607 8663 8597 8662 8735 4467 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
779% Outstanding
Read 3,773
Write 8,239
Mixed 3,794
SusWrite 7,955
1,355% 5,940 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 215
4K Mixed 79.1
291% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,180
DQ Write 1,200
DQ Mixed 1,215
906% 1,198 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 779%
Great: 422%
Amd-raid ST14000DM001-2JC 14TB
1TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 146 146 145 146 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 120
Write 109
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 144
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.2
937% 7.53 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 141%
Amd-raid ST12000DM0007-2G 12TB
344GB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 123 123 122 123 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 160
Write 144
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 121
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.2
1,335% 10.9 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7CJR4N-XN 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
179% Outstanding
MC Read 78.6
MC Write 47.8
MC Mixed 90.1
206% 72.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 39.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 124%
This bench: 179%
Great: 238%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI Builds (Compare 336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 319%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback