Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200408
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateMay 16 '21 at 22:19
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 68.2
1-Core 129
2-Core 263
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 746
75% 608 Pts
64-Core 828
51% 828 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.27
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46% Average
Lighting 51.4
Reflection 94
Parallax 50.5
42% 65.3 fps
MRender 56.7
Gravity 82.3
Splatting 60.2
54% 66.4 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 46%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDHL500GB-D8 500GB
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1115F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 752 330 62 242 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 1,355
Write 529
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 245
120% 553 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 18.1
68% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 611
DQ Write 64.7
DQ Mixed 113
140% 263 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 229%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
59GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 151 150 151 152 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 418
Write 377
Mixed 343
SusWrite 178
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 42.4
139% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 204
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 124%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
262GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 74 71 72 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 18.2
Write 37.5
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 73.5
28% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
49% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
465GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 80 83 84 79 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 80.5
Write 81.2
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 80.9
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 43%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$80
738GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 142 143 144 144 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 160
Write 136
Mixed 81
SusWrite 142
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.9
195% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.1% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 26.4
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 19.6
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,979 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback