Today's hottest deals

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics39.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201215
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateMay 20 '21 at 05:45
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 72.7
1-Core 148
2-Core 290
91% 170 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 833
89% 707 Pts
64-Core 1,086
67% 1,086 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Gigabyte(1458 2261) 3GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.2.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Lighting 53.6
Reflection 37.2
Parallax 68.5
44% 53.1 fps
MRender 35.6
Gravity 55.8
Splatting 28
32% 39.8 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC2500M8500G 500GB
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S7780100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 853 689 640 739 664 738 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 2,700
Write 1,138
Mixed 1259
SusWrite 720
321% 1,454 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 52.3
180% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,039
DQ Write 77
DQ Mixed 126
201% 414 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 232%
Great: 334%
Corsair Force GT 240GB-$499
65GB free
Firmware: 5.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 163 147 167 147 149 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 442
Write 152
Mixed 188
SusWrite 154
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 19.2
80% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 54.3
DQ Mixed 76.8
64% 95.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
626GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 105 97 106 95 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 100
Write 91.9
Mixed 62
SusWrite 101
65% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
206GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 119 109 121 108 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63% Good
Read 105
Write 106
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 115
71% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63%
Great: 70%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0604
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 34 37 33 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 35.1
Write 35.4
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 35.2
25% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.1
170% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 104%
ASUS WHD-A2 1TB
911GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 100 92 101 90 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 96
111% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.4% Good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 27.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 26.4
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 5,087 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback