Asrock A75M-HVS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A75M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121119
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 26 '21 at 18:58
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 651
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 45
2-Core 91.7
44% 68.5 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 178
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
PwrHis(1787 3000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.5% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 1.4
1% 0.83 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.5%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S4500105
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 364
Write 290
Mixed 330
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 37.8
125% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 42.3
DQ Write 92.6
DQ Mixed 55.8
46% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 207
Write 100
Mixed 71.3
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-511.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.7% Poor
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 7.5
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A75M-HVS Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A75M-HVS - $238

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback