Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80FF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80FF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G70-80
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150731
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '24 at 08:59
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 3805U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 50.9
2-Core 57.6
39% 56.8 Pts
4-Core 68.5
8-Core 64.2
9% 66.3 Pts
64-Core 63.8
4% 63.8 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 920M
Legend(17AA 381C) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 8.6
6% 7.07 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 6.9
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S4500105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 296 301 325 381 241 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 347
Write 340
Mixed 311
SusWrite 299
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 27.1
89% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 126
97% 133 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0467 RMT3170ME68F9F1600 8GB
0, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 11.6
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.1
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 27: 0P 3R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 9% 121 86 30 60 17.2" 1280 720 AUO119E
Typical 80FF Builds (Compare 224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80FF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback