TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte B450M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B450M DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte B450M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '21 at 21:04
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 52.1
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 182
56% 105 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 564
52% 433 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 54.2%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.10.16
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 25.3
14% 18.4 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 13.6
12% 13.9 fps
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 13.3%
 Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0B- 240GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 10 2.1 2.5 141 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 288
Write 294
Mixed 224
SusWrite 61.8
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 9.1
41% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 45.4
DQ Write 73.5
DQ Mixed 23.4
28% 47.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 30.2%
 Great: 42%
Amd-raid SAMSUNG HD161HJ 160GB
107GB free
Firmware: GF10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 41 43 42 56 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.4% Below average
Read 64.3
Write 68.6
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 48.2
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FE 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
40.7% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 14.1
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 40.7%
 Great: 47%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-B450M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 16,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $88

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples3,619x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples2,723x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD  $185Bench 74%, 142,983 samples1,093x
GPU
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples1,294x
RX 570AMD  $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples989x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples987x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples677x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples424x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples351x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples938x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples597x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples428x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $436
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback