Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 70% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	79% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210423
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 09 '21 at 15:54
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160 33,544 User benchmarks, average bench 82% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Memory 82.2 1-Core 145 2-Core 292 93% 173 Pts	4-Core 569 8-Core 839 88% 704 Pts	64-Core 834 52% 834 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79% Very good	Lighting 97.8 Reflection 107 Parallax 96.9 80% 100 fps	MRender 89.7 Gravity 98.1 Splatting 95.6 78% 94.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000L1 128GB 430 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT24L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 164 163 165 163 165 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 471 Mixed 406 SusWrite 177 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 45.4 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 61.7 210% 75.2 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 288 217% 290 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 109%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power32G 32GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 23GB free, PID 0916 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 39.3 Write 22.3 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 20.2 30% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 51,435 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	94% Outstanding	MC Read 40.6 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 36.8 97% 33.8 GB/s	SC Read 26.5 SC Write 24.3 SC Mixed 36.4 83% 29.1 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 2,987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	566x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	524x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	456x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	325x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	268x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	193x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	261x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	185x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	144x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	146x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	62x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $987

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16