Performance Results


Gaming 65% Destroyer	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	68.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	19.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210427
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '21 at 10:41
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	63%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900-$284 11,130 User benchmarks, average bench 94% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Memory 73 1-Core 151 2-Core 248 87% 157 Pts	4-Core 598 8-Core 765 87% 682 Pts	64-Core 1,922 119% 1,922 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 8769) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Lighting 93.8 Reflection 88.7 Parallax 76.4 76% 86.3 fps	MRender 62.9 Gravity 73.5 Splatting 60.5 53% 65.6 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 512GB 26,235 User benchmarks, average bench 209% 274GB free (System drive) Firmware: VB421D57 SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 290 64 247 217 242 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	156% Outstanding	Read 1,563 Write 1,036 Mixed 832 SusWrite 231 203% 916 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 75.5 4K Mixed 35.2 133% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 977 DQ Write 770 DQ Mixed 1,014 720% 920 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 309%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 512GB 26,235 User benchmarks, average bench 209% 334GB free Firmware: VB421D57 SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 256 25 310 308 229 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	167% Outstanding	Read 1,849 Write 1,234 Mixed 385 SusWrite 260 205% 932 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 98.2 4K Mixed 21.2 128% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,043 DQ Write 752 DQ Mixed 1,157 794% 984 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 309%
Seagate ST12000NM0538-2K2101 12TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1.5TB free Firmware: CN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 30 27 26 26 23 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	8.84% Terrible	Read 5 Write 22.5 Mixed 8 SusWrite 25.7 11% 15.3 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0 11% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.84% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CB16GU2666.C8ET 2x16GB 320 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	58% Above average	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 18.3 61% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 16.1 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 94.7 42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 104%

UFO

Desktop 105%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	274x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	247x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $84Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	200x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	112x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 90%, 101,975 samples	110x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $68Bench 85%, 86,372 samples	104x

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $641

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16