Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z68-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V LX  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111021
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 21:01
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 193
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 352
49% 364 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 79%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.3% Above average
Lighting 66.1
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 90.3
54% 73.7 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 47.6
49% 61.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMB1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 126 132 135 175 154 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.4% Average
Read 228
Write 108
Mixed 144
SusWrite 152
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 16.8
67% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 35.8
DQ Write 37.4
DQ Mixed 33.2
26% 35.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 94%
St12000n M0008-2H3101 12TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.06% Terrible
Read 36
Write 32.8
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 33.8
7% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 1.1
20% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.06%
Great: 40%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$106
851GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 79 78 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 76
Write 69.6
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 77.9
50% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 57%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
27GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 10 12 10 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.71% Terrible
Read 20.1
Write 10.2
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 11.3
19% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.71%
Great: 21%
General USB Flash Disk 252GB
66GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 229
Write 71.3
133% 150 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 8.4
666% 9.73 MB/s
DQ Read 12.8
DQ Write 12
DQ Mixed 9.5
779% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 17.6
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 2R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 44% 18 130 8 60 34" 3440 1440 ACR0763 EI342CKR
Typical P8Z68-V LX Builds (Compare 1,898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback