Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '21 at 12:11
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$486
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 65.3
1-Core 154
2-Core 309
92% 176 Pts
4-Core 607
8-Core 1,150
105% 878 Pts
64-Core 2,824
175% 2,824 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 234
Parallax 142
123% 176 fps
MRender 208
Gravity 166
Splatting 0.3
89% 125 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 109%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 59 55 55 55 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 458
Write 420
Mixed 396
SusWrite 84.8
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 31.7
128% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 47.3
DQ Mixed 104
83% 122 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 91%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
10GB free
Firmware: M0C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 316
Write 458
Mixed 370
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 25.8
116% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 140
118% 170 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 99%
St12000n M0008-2H3101 12TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 240 243 245 245 244 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 224
Write 221
Mixed 210
SusWrite 235
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 1.4
61% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 3.5
DQ Write 4.4
DQ Mixed 0.5
1% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 40%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
88GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 167 168 169 167 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 136
Write 134
Mixed 113
SusWrite 164
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.2% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 13
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,737 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $918
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback