Gigabyte GA-Z370M DS3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z370M DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370M DS3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 12 '21 at 06:30
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$139
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 125
2-Core 253
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 704
76% 604 Pts
64-Core 698
43% 698 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Gigabyte(1458 371A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.2% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 75
Parallax 68.3
57% 71.2 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 65.9
54% 66.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 112 47 126 38 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 415
Write 116
Mixed 240
SusWrite 94.7
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 41.4
160% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 36
52% 104 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 91%
WD My Book 25DA 8TB
3TB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 119 123 121 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 123
Write 128
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 119
149% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.3
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 67%
WDC WD40 PURX-64GVNY0 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 125 120 124 124 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 127
Write 128
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 124
152% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 53%
WDC WD20 PURZ-85GU6Y0 2TB
824GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 121 125 124 128 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.9% Above average
Read 140
Write 140
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 124
160% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 55%
ST4000DX 001-1CE168 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 112 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 109
Write 96.9
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 39
103% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.4
240% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.5% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 25
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 24.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 42: 6R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
42% 41% 34 309 223 75 21.7" 1920 1080 GSM5B44 MP59HT
History: Score 7: 0R 2G 1B | Score 42: 6R 2G 6B
Typical GA-Z370M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370M DS3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback