Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 162%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 140%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive360% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191218
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateJan 23 '22 at 17:19
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$183
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 148
2-Core 294
99% 180 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 881
92% 737 Pts
64-Core 861
53% 861 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 103%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 882C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
157% Outstanding
Lighting 235
Reflection 209
Parallax 199
192% 215 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 154
Splatting 136
130% 162 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 157%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
466GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1649 1452 1505 1494 1461 1462 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
360% Outstanding
Read 2,623
Write 2,351
Mixed 1,785
SusWrite 1,504
463% 2,066 MB/s
4K Read 68.3
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 87.9
296% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,847
DQ Write 1,384
DQ Mixed 1,558
1,180% 1,596 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 360%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
369GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 488 489 488 489 489 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 454
Mixed 460
SusWrite 488
108% 477 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 57.4
190% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
591GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 145 144 145 144 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 132
Write 134
Mixed 97.9
SusWrite 144
29% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
4% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 134%
WD Red 5TB (2014)-$101
96GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 95 95 95 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 124
Write 118
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 93.8
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 98%
WD Red 5TB (2014)-$101
96GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 92 93 93 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 172
Write 154
Mixed 105
SusWrite 91.7
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 98%
WDC WD40 PURX-64GVNY0 4TB
178GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
23% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 40
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 41.8
52% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
122% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$110
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 31.9
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 41.2
SC Mixed 30.1
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 52.5
76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,657 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $380

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $1,243
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback