Asus MAXIMUS IX EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	11.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 14 '21 at 10:32
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 98.9 1-Core 150 2-Core 298 101% 182 Pts	4-Core 594 8-Core 838 90% 716 Pts	64-Core 839 52% 839 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 401F) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.83% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 5.4 Parallax 4.9 4% 4.97 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5.1 4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.83% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT24B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 495 304 295 295 294 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	135% Outstanding	Read 521 Write 496 Mixed 459 SusWrite 363 103% 460 MB/s	4K Read 52.1 4K Write 135 4K Mixed 71 242% 86.1 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 363 273% 366 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 126%
JetFlash TS1GJF110 1GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 1GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.74% Terrible	Read 27.3 Write 6.7 Mixed 10 SusWrite 7.4 14% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 57% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.74% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 4400 C19 Series 4x8GB 1,495 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	132% Outstanding	MC Read 50.3 MC Write 50.7 MC Mixed 38.4 133% 46.5 GB/s	SC Read 28.1 SC Write 53.5 SC Mixed 41.9 118% 41.2 GB/s	Latency 41.7 96% 41.7 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 146%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 8: 0R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
8%	10%	42	32	8	30	46.9"	1920 1080	HJW1836 MACROSILICON

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX EXTREME Builds (Compare 375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX EXTREME

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	200x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	54x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	27x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	54x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	34x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	27x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	21x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	11x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	11x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	15x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $907

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16