Today's hottest deals

Asus G551JW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G551JW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G551JW
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150116
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateAug 01 '17 at 19:15
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 204
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 122
40% 250 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 185D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.17% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 6.72
3% 6.97 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.26
6% 7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.17%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CHN HFmSATA01M 128 128GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0921A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 307
Write 191
Mixed 238
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 2.97
36% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 13.6
DQ Write 27.3
DQ Mixed 11.5
11% 17.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 51%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
766GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 97.1
Write 107
Mixed 101
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.22
82% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G551JW Builds (Compare 669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G551JW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback