Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 108% UFO	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	62% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	381% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210521
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '21 at 01:41
Run Duration	351 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$160 89,263 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 88.1 1-Core 167 2-Core 332 105% 196 Pts	4-Core 647 8-Core 1,156 108% 902 Pts	64-Core 1,589 98% 1,589 Pts
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6264) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62% Good	Lighting 78.7 Reflection 78.3 Parallax 71.5 64% 76.2 fps	MRender 68.1 Gravity 74 Splatting 70.2 58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$288 9,454 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 1TB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 435 429 430 449 426 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 429 Mixed 428 SusWrite 434 101% 450 MB/s	4K Read 46 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 44.5 151% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 187 140% 187 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$288 9,454 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 739GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 877 468 468 468 469 465 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 90% Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$288 9,454 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 845GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 434 428 428 448 425 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 432 Mixed 430 SusWrite 432 101% 451 MB/s	4K Read 46.7 4K Write 49.5 4K Mixed 47.6 158% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 184 135% 179 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$288 9,454 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 479GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 434 428 428 448 425 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 435 Mixed 434 SusWrite 432 102% 452 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 51.7 4K Mixed 48.9 160% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 182 132% 175 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 137%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$118 327,441 User benchmarks, average bench 385% 868GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2670 2667 2634 2608 1971 1566 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	381% Outstanding	Read 3,027 Write 2,639 Mixed 2,738 SusWrite 2,353 605% 2,689 MB/s	4K Read 85.7 4K Write 73.4 4K Mixed 80.5 272% 79.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,319 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 234 292% 553 MB/s
Poor: 266% ↑ This bench: 381% Great: 477%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$175 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 130 129 134 128 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Read 129 Write 127 Mixed 88.9 SusWrite 130 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.1 215% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 98%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$259 4,113 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 3.5TB free Firmware: 01.01L01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 158 157 155 162 153 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 152 Mixed 104 SusWrite 157 106% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.9 196% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3733 C19 2x16GB 1,906 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 42.2 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 39 103% 36.1 GB/s	SC Read 28.7 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 43.5 94% 33 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	7	60	27.5"	1280 720	SAM0C4D U28E590

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $276

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $227Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,204x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $358Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	895x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $314Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	891x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $730Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	623x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	540x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,350Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	504x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $118Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	495x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $116Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	317x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $170Bench 402%, 182,136 samples	223x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	296x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	163x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 29,515 samples	95x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $1,351

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400