Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics69.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210406
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 15 '21 at 01:25
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900KF-$255
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 157
2-Core 313
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 632
8-Core 1,176
108% 904 Pts
64-Core 2,091
129% 2,091 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Asus(1043 86BD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.3% Good
Lighting 91.6
Reflection 88.8
Parallax 76.1
75% 85.5 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 79.7
Splatting 70.2
59% 71.9 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 603 608 608 605 605 603 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 2,382
Write 1,506
Mixed 578
SusWrite 605
279% 1,267 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 41.7
160% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,054
DQ Write 628
DQ Mixed 711
564% 798 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 218%
Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
570GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 176 178 176 177 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 177
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 177
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16D4/4G KHX2133C14D4/4G KHX2666C16D4/4G KHX2133C14D4/4G 16GB
2667, 2133, 2667, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 26.3
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 27.5
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 6 60 21.5" 1920 1080 ACI22FD ASUS VS228
Typical TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 4,359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback