Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 22:04
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 980
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 116
53% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 190
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
Asus(1043 04A1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Lighting 36.3
Reflection 39.6
Parallax 47.6
30% 41.2 fps
MRender 33.3
Gravity 35.3
Splatting 27.5
26% 32 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 128GB-$150
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 183 181 185 184 184 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 300
Write 232
Mixed 222
SusWrite 185
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 36.8
129% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 153
128% 185 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 86%
ESA3SMD2HTGT120G 120GB
102GB free
Firmware: N111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 272 269 269 271 271 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.3% Excellent
Read 494
Write 283
Mixed 267
SusWrite 269
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 38.5
132% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 150
115% 157 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 84%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
3GB free, PID 5567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 15
Write 14.8
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 14.7
16% 12 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.1
141% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.9% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 13.7
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 72.3" 1280 701 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback