Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 17:16
Run Duration485 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 173
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 330
45% 334 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
456GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 242 243 242 242 242 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.3% Good
Read 254
Write 240
Mixed 190
SusWrite 241
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 31.3
101% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 196
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 62 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 111
Write 97.3
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 62.4
61% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 74%
WDC WD50 00LPLX-75ZNTT0 500GB
209GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 24 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 21.6
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 25.5
32% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 23%
MEMORYSAVER 16GB
1GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 15 10 4.4 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
8.43% Terrible
Read 26.1
Write 17.4
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 12
17% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.43%
Great: 32%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB
16GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 20.9
14% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
20% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.4
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 0" 1280 720
Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 11,785 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback