Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79TO
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime5 Days
Run DateSep 26 '21 at 07:32
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 181
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 565
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 697
43% 697 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000D
Nvidia(10DE 0914) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 6.7
6% 7.7 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 7
7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 278 274 273 268 273 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 462
Write 322
Mixed 284
SusWrite 282
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 29.4
99% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 172
162% 257 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
87GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,975
Write 1,682
Mixed 1,350
371% 1,669 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 48.1
148% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 595
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 320
259% 377 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
861GB free
Firmware: A560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 99 99 100 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 70.4
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 98.4
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 57%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
45GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 49 49 50 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 56.4
Write 57.1
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 48.8
39% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4A4D313333334B4C482D38472020202020 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.1% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 7.4
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 3R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 12% 64 130 100 60 7.2" 1360 768 SAM029D SAMSUNG
History: Score 5: 1R 0G 0B | Score 24: 3R 2G 3B
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback