Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20354

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20354  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5A5
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150721
Uptime9.4 Days
Run DateOct 02 '21 at 16:40
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 48.4
2-Core 149
52% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 204
28% 205 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 380D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 6.3
3% 6.87 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Turbox 240GB 240GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XKR905
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 159 1.5 4.2 18 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 374
Write 284
Mixed 281
SusWrite 40.6
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.4
22% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 16.6
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0456
Typical 20354 Builds (Compare 2,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20354

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback