Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '21 at 16:27
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700T 7,380 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 90 1-Core 104 2-Core 186 75% 127 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 604 62% 502 Pts	64-Core 604 37% 604 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 85D8) 2GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Lighting 38.6 Reflection 36.9 Parallax 34.6 32% 36.7 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 35.9 Splatting 25 26% 32.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM001B SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 438 451 458 474 468 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 466 Write 443 Mixed 288 SusWrite 435 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 38.6 150% 57.1 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 67.3 126% 251 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 111%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 215GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 218 205 212 196 196 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Read 380 Write 251 Mixed 298 SusWrite 203 63% 283 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 51.2 180% 65.5 MB/s	DQ Read 259 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 291 204% 258 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 94%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 219GB free Firmware: SAFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.5% Poor	Read 41 Write 41.5 Mixed 40.6 SusWrite 41 9% 41 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 15.2 4K Mixed 14.3 48% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 29.5 DQ Write 25.8 DQ Mixed 22.4 18% 25.9 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.2% Very good	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 31.4 MC Mixed 22.7 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 23.2 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 111%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 87%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	42x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	25x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	15x
CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 24GBCorsairBench 65%, 14 samples	14x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $1,240

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16