Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 18:22
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$177
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 79
1-Core 146
2-Core 286
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 908
90% 735 Pts
64-Core 1,468
91% 1,468 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.1% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 119
Parallax 126
105% 125 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 88.8
Splatting 90.8
84% 105 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 990 971 902 984 1013 1012 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,128
Write 1,018
Mixed 993
SusWrite 979
232% 1,030 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 55
181% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 464
DQ Write 810
DQ Mixed 634
482% 636 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 190%
Great: 181%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 196 190 196 199 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 192
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 196
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
USB 2.0 SD MMC Reader 8GB
7GB free, PID 8123
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4 4 4 4.3 4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
8.24% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 3
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 4.2
8% 7.35 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.5
147% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.24%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.8% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 22.3
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 29
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 82.4
49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $749
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback