Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8560w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 8560w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1631
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161027
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 11:33
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2640M
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 153
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 217
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M
HP(103C 1631) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 341.98
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.77 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37/960GB 960GB
760GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T051
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 184 117 124 15 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 407
Write 335
Mixed 341
SusWrite 83.1
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 18.6
74% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 0.4
62% 143 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 96%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
566GB free
Firmware: JB0O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 116 115 116 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 116
Write 115
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 116
67% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8560w Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8560w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback