QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 15:51
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 10 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 80
1-Core 151
2-Core 297
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 583
8-Core 1,103
100% 843 Pts
64-Core 1,240
77% 1,240 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
161% Outstanding
Lighting 219
Reflection 201
Parallax 251
179% 224 fps
MRender 258
Gravity 221
Splatting 172
173% 217 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 161%
Great: 174%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 411 423 422 425 427 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 430
Mixed 337
SusWrite 417
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 36.3
128% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 151
148% 234 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 36.7
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 36.2
82% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback