Asus Pro WS X299 SAGE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive537% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS X299 SAGE II  (all builds)
Memory108.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateOct 24 '21 at 11:30
Run Duration465 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10920X-$850
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 146
2-Core 287
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1,072
98% 822 Pts
64-Core 2,141
132% 2,141 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Lighting 38.8
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 37
32% 39.2 fps
MRender 50.8
Gravity 37
Splatting 39.2
34% 42.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M8Pe NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$110
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 54 44 40 46 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
537% Outstanding
Read 5,093
Write 55.5
Mixed 113
SusWrite 48.2
276% 1,327 MB/s
4K Read 818
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 7
1,250% 276 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 537%
Great: 215%
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
212GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 268 270 265 261 264 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 2,002
Write 1130
Mixed 1,070
SusWrite 293
248% 1,123 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 77.4
295% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 823
DQ Write 892
DQ Mixed 270
366% 662 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 226%
Great: 244%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
466GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2090 2079 2104 2087 1532 760 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
351% Outstanding
Read 2,223
Write 2,106
Mixed 2,058
SusWrite 1,775
460% 2,041 MB/s
4K Read 66.3
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 88.1
311% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,418
DQ Write 1,165
DQ Mixed 1,274
959% 1,286 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 351%
Great: 429%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 8.7 15 12 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 121 125 120 122 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 129
Write 112
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 121
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 112%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 108 114 95 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
62% Good
Read 112
Write 78.1
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 104
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62%
Great: 123%
Seagate USB 1TB
799GB free, PID a313
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 37 36 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
65% Good
Read 37.6
Write 37.7
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 37.1
51% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 13.7
1,049% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 13.2
DQ Write 17.2
DQ Mixed 14.8
1,137% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 65%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
106% Outstanding
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 57.7
MC Mixed 35.6
122% 42.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 106%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro WS X299 SAGE II Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 176%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS X299 SAGE II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $2,328
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback