Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '21 at 01:23
Run Duration417 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 152
2-Core 297
99% 180 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 1,010
96% 793 Pts
64-Core 1,624
100% 1,624 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.4% Very good
Lighting 91.7
Reflection 131
Parallax 82.8
75% 102 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 98.7
Splatting 91.5
86% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$154
605GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1122 1049 1054 1027 1125 1137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 2,421
Write 2,280
Mixed 1453
SusWrite 1,086
405% 1,810 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 77
258% 89.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1165
DQ Write 863
DQ Mixed 999
751% 1,009 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 288%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
23GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 487
Write 456
Mixed 428
102% 457 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 57.1
191% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 355
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$154
215GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1497 1169 1145 1147 1140 1153 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 2,304
Write 2,342
Mixed 1,572
SusWrite 1,209
416% 1,857 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 77.6
253% 89.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,306
DQ Write 1,010
DQ Mixed 1,127
852% 1,148 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 296%
Great: 372%
WD My Passport 25E2 2TB
143GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 28 31 28 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 35.1
Write 18
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 29.6
34% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 53%
Apple iPod 4GB
1GB free, PID 1205
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5 4.9 5.8 5.6 5.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
2.29% Terrible
Read 5.2
Write 5
Mixed 5
SusWrite 5.4
7% 5.15 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
8% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.29%
Great: 3%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 30.7
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 44.4
SC Mixed 29.4
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 15,258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $298

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback