Performance Results


Gaming 137% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 138% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Memory 82.2 1-Core 147 2-Core 299 95% 176 Pts	4-Core 586 8-Core 1,023 97% 805 Pts	64-Core 1,498 93% 1,498 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% MSI(1462 3711) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.63 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	145% Outstanding	Lighting 191 Reflection 181 Parallax 211 156% 194 fps	MRender 246 Gravity 200 Splatting 154 159% 200 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 145% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 501GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 448 445 447 449 447 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 392 Write 423 Mixed 290 SusWrite 439 87% 386 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 83.1 4K Mixed 41.8 151% 53.4 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 293 DQ Mixed 240 205% 303 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 117%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 180,890 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 385GB free Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1289 825 817 826 820 823 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	225% Outstanding	Read 1552 Write 1,798 Mixed 1,424 SusWrite 900 320% 1,419 MB/s	4K Read 45.7 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 63.4 217% 78.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,193 DQ Write 634 DQ Mixed 898 671% 908 MB/s
Poor: 164% ↑ This bench: 225% Great: 276%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB 47,517 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 165 166 164 166 164 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 185 Write 160 Mixed 107 SusWrite 165 35% 154 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 9.6 4K Mixed 0.7 7% 3.73 MB/s	DQ Read 0.7 DQ Write 9.3 DQ Mixed 1.3 2% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 64GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.4% Good	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 20.6 64% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 21.8 63% 22 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 101%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	236x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $154Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	193x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	172x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	127x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	103x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $115Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	89x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,455

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16