Asus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateNov 16 '21 at 18:36
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 96.4
1-Core 129
2-Core 237
88% 154 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 583
62% 496 Pts
64-Core 535
33% 535 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.8% Poor
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 46.4
Parallax 36.6
29% 39.4 fps
MRender 36.2
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 25.7
26% 32.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,342
Write 1,193
Mixed 953
258% 1,163 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 75
254% 89.9 MB/s
DQ Read 945
DQ Write 765
DQ Mixed 868
646% 859 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Sabrent AS2115 250GB
108GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 208 202 203 204 203 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 357
Write 270
Mixed 196
SusWrite 205
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 20.1
76% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 94.6
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 51.3
60% 102 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
161GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 128 132 135 109 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 160
Write 136
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 126
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
110GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 171 170 172 171 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 131
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 170
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 24.1
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 21.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 52.5
76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII FORMULA Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA - $284

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $917
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback