Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '21 at 01:24
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 72.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 239
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 774
77% 625 Pts
64-Core 921
57% 921 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$143
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.7% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 58.2
Parallax 50.1
46% 55 fps
MRender 42.2
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 47.3
39% 47 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BACKUP+ 128GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 229 234 234 238 237 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 250
Write 234
Mixed 227
SusWrite 234
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 25.7
88% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 104
85% 121 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 36
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 24.4
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 26.4
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback