Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0 3,274 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 59.6 2-Core 142 55% 92.8 Pts	4-Core 252 8-Core 408 40% 330 Pts	64-Core 503 31% 503 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Lighting 17.6 Reflection 16.7 Parallax 18 14% 17.4 fps	MRender 21.8 Gravity 18.2 Splatting 15 15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0503A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 450 Write 382 Mixed 52.5 65% 295 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 6.9 4K Mixed 0.5 34% 9 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54 24,309 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 35GB free Firmware: HP35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 64 67 62 73 70 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 90.7 Write 89.4 Mixed 61.1 SusWrite 67.5 57% 77.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41HE4BDFA- 4x4GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	44% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 14.8 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 8.6 27% 9.33 GB/s	Latency 86.7 46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	127x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	62x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	58x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16