Acer Aspire V5-573G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire V5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_HW
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140416
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 05 '17 at 12:04
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 83.9
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 115
56% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 164
19% 149 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M
Acer(1025 079B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7892
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
8.57% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 9.27
Parallax 10.2
8% 9.82 fps
MRender 8.19
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 12.5
9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.57%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BR 60G 60GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 14_2.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.2% Poor
Read 358
Write 53
Mixed 97.5
36% 169 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 1.49
35% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 41.3
DQ Write 55.7
DQ Mixed 1.29
14% 32.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR6A-PB Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 15.7
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-573G Builds (Compare 306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-573G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $361
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback