Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20351

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
CPU throttled at 70% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20351  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5A2
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '22 at 00:03
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 62.7
1-Core 22.5
2-Core 38.9
30% 41.4 Pts
4-Core 97.3
8-Core 182
17% 140 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 380C) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3379
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 3.5
2% 2.47 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM000-SSHD-8GB 500GB
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LVD3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 12 11 14 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Read 4.8
Write 11.5
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 12.7
8% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 5.1%
Great: 63%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 500GB
433GB free, PID 2100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 21 21 23 20 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.16% Terrible
Read 18.1
Write 18.6
Mixed 11
SusWrite 21.3
24% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
31% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.16%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3170EF68F9W1600 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.5% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20351 Builds (Compare 1,849 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20351

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback