Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 09 '22 at 00:12
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 88.4
1-Core 166
2-Core 328
104% 194 Pts
4-Core 616
8-Core 1,013
100% 815 Pts
64-Core 1,210
75% 1,210 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 144
Parallax 131
112% 137 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 139
Splatting 121
101% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 3 1TB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 80 33 36 35 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 392
Write 270
Mixed 338
SusWrite 51.7
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 13.1
45% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 99.1
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 102
87% 124 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 332%
Amd-raid Array 4 239GB
47GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 91 37 40 38 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 303
Write 118
Mixed 225
SusWrite 58.5
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 12.4
41% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 64
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 62.3
62% 96 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 95%
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB
131GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 88 36 40 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 97
Write 94.7
Mixed 62
SusWrite 57
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.7
166% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 201%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
227GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 81 35 38 35 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 140
Write 116
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 53
70% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 114%
General USB Flash Disk 32GB
27GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 33 32 33 31 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 139
Write 49.9
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 33.6
78% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2.6
166% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K Crucial BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K Crucial BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 37.4
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 31
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 39
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 160%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,204
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback