Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210118
Uptime21.9 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 21:55
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$106
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 83.2
1-Core 153
2-Core 291
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 907
89% 728 Pts
64-Core 1,142
71% 1,142 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$234
Asus(1043 8787) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.5% Very good
Lighting 91.4
Reflection 88.5
Parallax 83
74% 87.6 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 80
Splatting 68.4
69% 86.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 140 47 48 30 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 451
Write 391
Mixed 167
SusWrite 93.6
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 16
77% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 35.1
46% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
914GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 191 190 191 190 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 140
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 190
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
17GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 11 13 11 8.3 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 82.7
Write 50.7
Mixed 17
SusWrite 10.7
45% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 2.2
106% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.8% Below average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 11.1
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 7,163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $524
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback