Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '22 at 17:02
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 208
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 638
63% 514 Pts
64-Core 852
53% 852 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$155
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Lighting 28
Reflection 38
Parallax 37
23% 34.3 fps
MRender 31.8
Gravity 26.5
Splatting 25.9
23% 28.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X1480G 480GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 420 426 429 431 430 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 420
Mixed 391
SusWrite 428
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 29.6
127% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 50.4
91% 174 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$35
620GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 151 165 169 166 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 124
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 161
87% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 107%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
5GB free, PID 0021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 7.6 8.1 8.4 7.3 8.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
8.95% Terrible
Read 38.9
Write 23.3
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 7.5
20% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.95%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.3% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback