Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 19 '21 at 09:39
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 68.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 207
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 438
60% 443 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29% Poor
Lighting 37
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 37.5
30% 38.3 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 26.9
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 382 410 395 411 406 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 488
Write 414
Mixed 337
SusWrite 381
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 33.8
113% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 182
145% 204 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
763GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 189 193 192 193 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 157
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 187
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
9GB free, PID 0021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 1.8 0 0 0 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
2.85% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 3.7
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 1
7% 6.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.85%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
78.5% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 26.7
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 21.6
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 1R 5G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 23% 26 342 279 60 84.6" 1536 864 VES3700 55UHD_LCD_TV
History: Score 10: 2R 0G 0B | Score 18: 3R 1G 0B | Score 20: 1R 5G 0B
Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 4,638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $299
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback