Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Wave Desktop 600-a0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion Wave Desktop 600-a0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C9
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '22 at 22:58
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400T
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 85
2-Core 161
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 309
42% 312 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 81C9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.74% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 5.9
4% 5.57 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 5
Splatting 8.7
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.74%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVPV128HDGM-000H1 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW74H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 181 150 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 1,086
Write 250
Mixed 377
SusWrite 116
99% 457 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 38.9
157% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 942
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 219
240% 429 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 122%
Great: 196%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
392GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 121 107 114 115 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 150
Write 140
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 117
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 029E CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
68.1% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 21.3
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 20.8
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Wave Desktop 600-a0xx Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Wave Desktop 600-a0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback