bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System
Motherboard	Intel DQ67SW
Memory	8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110520
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '22 at 23:20
Run Duration	267 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31220-$305 2,507 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	70% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 84.2 2-Core 167 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 322 43% 324 Pts	64-Core 317 20% 317 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5750 12,403 User benchmarks, average bench 8% PwrHis(1787 2287) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	8.42% Terrible	Lighting 11.2 Reflection 11.8 Parallax 9.9 9% 11 fps	MRender 9.6 Gravity 8.6 Splatting 7.9 7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.42% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 167GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32070RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 50 83 84 82 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 374 Write 75.7 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 77.6 28% 133 MB/s	4K Read 8.5 4K Write 44.5 4K Mixed 15.2 56% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 0.2 43% 104 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 462GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 139 142 142 142 142 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Read 142 Write 136 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 141 88% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 88%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159 43,620 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 245GB free Firmware: GM4OA5CA SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 10 10 9.9 9.9 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Read 74.2 Write 75.5 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 10 37% 49.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 51%
Hitachi TOURO Mobile 1TB 1,327 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 294GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 24.8 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 18.2 18% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 57%
TOSHIBA MQ04ABD200 2TB 274 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2TB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 16 16 15 17 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 33.5 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 17 30% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 52%
Generic External 1TB 446 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 99GB free, PID 1840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 16.5 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 19.1 30% 22.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 25%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 2,234 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 205GB free, PID a009 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 31.5 Write 25.3 Mixed 20 SusWrite 19.1 31% 24 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 44%
VendorCo ProductCode 1TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 932GB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 19 17 19 13 20 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	9.73% Terrible	Read 33.7 Write 6.3 Mixed 2 SusWrite 16.8 16% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 9.73% Great: 10%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 666GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 23 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 15.9 29% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Kingston 99U5471-002.A01LF M378B5173QH0-CK0 Kingston 99U5471-002.A01LF 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.9% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.5 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 14.6 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 73.3 55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,023x
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,568x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	932x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,141x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	456x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16